UPDATED 12:03 EDT / MAY 14 2009

IBM’s Webspan Cloud to Compete with Azure?

Having thrown a little sand at IBM’s lack of a cloud compute service, I read the recent headlines about IBM Webspan with some trepidation. Geek’s.com proclaimed “IBM announces WebSpan, the first Windows Azure alternative,” gulp, had IBM really created a massive cloud service to rival the scope of Azure?home_main-cta

No: desite the hyperbolic headline this is an existing SaaS business integration provider named Hubspan building a Websphere based extension to its platform. Hubspan/Webspan is not a general compute platform; instead it is business integration SaaS with existing integration customers such as Visa. As I detailed in my initial piece, the economic pressures and operational challenges of a generalized compute cloud remain unattractive to big blue. If Azure wants to be the OS for the next 50 years, backed by massive data-center investments, Webspan is hardly comparable in scope or investment.

This is a great win for Hubspan who can now shout about being the foundation of the IBM cloud. IBM has some history of being late to markets and enriching partners while they wait to act.

Windows 3.0 Screen Shot

For its part Websphere has kept the IBM brand in the cloud discussion with partnerships like this, and regular updates to a nifty cloud developer page. Their developer portal hosts a proof of concept ‘cloud’ for sales demonstrations by partners (shrug). But why do they need service providing partners when they are owned by the largest IT service company in the world?

Sometimes big companies operate more like a collection of smaller and financially independent ones. Websphere’s  pursuit of  service partners for clouds is for better or worse an example of this phenomena. Enriching a partner in a critical new space is, well, classic IBM.  USA-GATES-FORTUNE-ENFANTS_LEC257014_20021112.PKG


Since you’re here …

… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.

If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.