Pundits Predicting Death of RIM Forget to Count Foreign Markets
Anton Wahlman is reporting on The Street that Research In Motion, the Canadian developer of the Blackberry smartphone, continually gets prodded in the pundit media as failing at market. However, as this doesn’t actually appear to be the case worldwide, he accuses reports of polling only the US market and then extrapolating that incorrectly as global market attitude:
First, these pundits don’t realize that in most of the countries of RIM’s main competitor is not Apple or Android, it’s Nokia. The Finnish company has about one-third of the world unit market for mobile phones, even though its market share in the U.S. is very close to zero. This means that in many countries, Nokia constitutes close to 50% of the market.
The U.S. smartphone market is uniquely warped, as Motorola CEO Sanjay Jah rarely forgets to remind us. In the U.S., almost all high-end smartphones sell for $200, while there is a second tier around $100 and then others at zero, all with a two-year contract.
Considering that most smartphone monthly bills run about $100, or $2,400 for two years, the upfront price difference is peanuts. Who cares if it’s $200, $100 or zero upfront, when I’m really paying $2,400 after that?
As a result of this warped U.S. pricing, the market has tilted heavily in favor of the smartphones most expensive to manufacture, most notably the iPhone and high-end Androids. Why not get the best for only $200? This means RIM is more challenged in the U.S. market.
In countries such as Indonesia pricing angles itself in a totally different direction where carriers offer much smaller monthly costs, but phones aren’t being subsidized by companies to get customers onto expensive plans. The result tilts costs in favor of buying a Nokia or Blackberry phone at less than half the price of iPhone and high-end Androids. As a result, iPhone does extremely poorly in these markets while RIM and Nokia shine.
The result is that RIM does report a beat-and-raise quarter repeatedly, even though it faces fierce competition in the US market—a fact that Wahlman points out that must be confusing pundits reporting RIM’s likely demise. Even if Blackberry flounders in the US market, they’ll still have foreign markets to pad their bottom line and continue to supply them with money and leverage to stay in the game.
Since you’re here …
… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.
If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.