FBI Denies Stolen Apple Codes Link
Hackers continue to hog the headlines this morning, with fresh doubts being cast on the origin of over a million Apple UDID codes that were allegedly stolen from an FBI agent’s laptop before being posted online by AntiSec.
Late last night, the FBI issued a strenuous denial that one of its laptops was compromised, and moreover, insisted that it had no interest in either collecting or storing this kind of data from Apple device users.
The rebuttal was issued following claims by the hacktivist group AntiSec that it had swiped the data from an FBI agent named Christopher Stangl, who is based at the Bureau’s Regional Cyber Action Team in New York. The hackers said that their goal in stealing the data and posting it online was to expose the fact that the agency is secretly collecting information from Apple users, which they allege can be used to log the GPS location and track the movements of anyone using an Apple device.
Unsurprisingly, the FBI has angrily denied that it’s involved in this, releasing the following statement:
“At this time there is no evidence indicating that an FBI laptop was compromised or that the FBI either sought or obtained this data.”
It’s difficult to know who to believe – on the one hand, AntiSec have produced nothing to back up their claims that the FBI are stalking iPhone users through their UDID codes, but then again, it’s only to be expected that the Bureau would deny holding such information. After all, it’s kind of hard to justify keeping this amount of private data on an overwhelmingly innocent and law abiding section of the population, perhaps even more so when many of them are not even US citizens.
For now, the only thing we can be certain of its that the database has been leaked from somewhere – it’s real – and so iPhone users have every reason to be concerned.
Since you’re here …
… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.
If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.