Ballmer’s Indifference Leaves Microsoft in Disarray
Microsoft dropped a bombshell last Friday by announcing that chief executive Steve Ballmer will quit his post within the next 12 months. Bill Gates, Chairman of the Audit Committee Chuck Noski and other top directors have been appointed to a special committee tasked with finding internal and external CEO candidates.
News of Ballmer’s early retirement raised many eyebrows in the tech industry. The 33-year Microsoft veteran’s failure to capitalize on cloud computing, mobile and search, coupled with his recent One Microsoft reorganization initiative, has led analysts to believe that he was ousted by the board after making one last stand.
“He got bounced by the board. Vote of no confidence,” said SiliconAngle Founder and Editor-in-Chief John Furrier. “He made the turn-around in July, big announcement. He went out publicly, tried to rally the troops. That was a move for him to make a last stand. Apparently the board didn’t like it.”
It’s not hard to see why Microsoft’s top brass wanted Ballmer out of the way. The executive bolstered revenues but neglected to build a cohesive vision that includes Xbox, the Zune, and Bing – innovative products that turned into losing investments during his stint at the helm. Wikibon co-founder David Floyer put it this way:
“The fundamental problem with Ballmer is he’s a classic marketing guy. He’s good at that, but he’s tone deaf to the subtleties, the intricacies of a broader world than just PCs. And he has just got things so wrong as to be an embarrassment to his colleagues and supporters.”
Ballmer’s indifference to the changing technological landscape has cost him his career, and may end up costing Microsoft its future as well. SiliconANGLE’s Mike Wheatley highlighted that the executive left the company as a “messy tangle of different divisions that lack any focus,” a tangle that his successor may find impossible to unwind.
Since you’re here …
… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.
If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.