UPDATED 23:10 EDT / APRIL 10 2016

NEWS

Proposed Burr-Feinstein bill would force backdoors, effectively ban end-to-end strong encryption

In a widely expected move following Apple’s dispute with the Department of Justice over iPhone encryption, a new bill is to be put forward in the Senate that wouldn’t just force the likes of Apple to provide a backdoor to their devices, but would effectively ban end-to-end strong encryption altogether.

Proposed by Senator Dianne Feinstein of California and Richard Burr of North Carolina, both members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, the bill would force tech companies to decrypt encrypted data upon receipt of a court order, or to provide any technical assistance required to decrypt it.

The sting in the bill though is that it provides no technical guidance on how companies should achieve this, meaning that in effect strong end-to-end encryption, such as that recently implemented by WhatsApp, Inc., would become illegal due to the fact that such forms of encryption cannot be cracked by any means; in short a company couldn’t implement this form of encryption and comply with the proposed law at the same time.

Not that it provides a lot of solace, but the bill does provide grounds for companies to be compensated for any assistance they are forced to provide.

“The draft [bill] shows how out of touch Senate Intelligence Committee leaders Sens. Burr and Feinstein are with the needs of the American people,” tech activist group Electronic Frontier Foundation said in a statement. “Millions of Americans suffer the loss, theft, or compromise of intimate communications, trade secrets, and identities each year.

“We desperately need more security, not less. Yet this bill would strongly discourage companies from providing it. The draft should never be introduced in a bill and should never advance in the Senate. ”

Open door

It’s been argued many times before, but continue to be ignored by those in power: creating a backdoor in an encrypted system creates an open door to bad actors.

As Wired explains:

Last summer, for instance, more than a dozen of the world’s top cryptographers published a paper warning of the dangers of weakening encryption on behalf of law enforcement. They cautioned that any backdoor created to give law enforcement access to encrypted communications would inevitably be used by sophisticated hackers and foreign cyberspies.

It should also be noted as well that just because American law forces local companies to offer a backdoor, it does nothing to stop someone who wanted to encrypt their data from doing so as the software required to do so is cheaply and freely available.

The only people who lose out from proposals such as this one are the good guys, your average citizen who is doing nothing wrong, while it will be business as usual for the bad guys.

At this current stage the proposed bill in only in draft form so it’s unclear when it will be presented to Congress for approval.

Image credit: pokpok/Flickr/CC by 2.0

Since you’re here …

… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.

If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.