Security with a brain: The difference between responding quick and responding smart | #Know16
Security teams and the bad guys that would best them are the Hatfields and McCoys of IT. As fast as security specialists come up with new protections, the hackers and bots are trailing right behind with new ways to penetrate them. Accepting their occurrence as more or less perennial, teams now focus on responding smarter to threats.
Sean Convery, VP and GM of the Security Business Unit at ServiceNow, Inc., said that one problem with the old way of doing things was treating all threats as equally dangerous. He told Dave Vellante (@dvellante) and Jeff Frick (@JeffFrick), cohosts of theCUBE, from the SiliconANGLE Media team, even compliance requirements have been an obstacle to smart security choices, sometimes giving strict grace periods for dealing with a threat.
“Even if it’s a low-priority vulnerability, you might have that be higher in the queue than something more critical that actually will impact the security of the organization,” Convery explained.
IT-security osmosis
The irony, said Convery, is that the keys to better threat response are right under security’s nose — in general IT. Rapid exchange of information from one department to the other can enable smarter choices in real time.
Instead of treating all threats as equal, he said, “Tell me who owns the particular IP address that’s being attacked right now, and tell me the service that IP address is supporting. Is this my summer company picnic planning website, or is this my financial reporting infrastructure?”
He said that SeviceNow’s reach into enterprise, workflows, automation and other non-security areas enable them to offer better security. “This feels like a new category of security technology, and one that really leverages ServiceNow’s expertise.”
Watch the full interview below, and be sure to check out more of SiliconANGLE and theCUBE’s coverage of ServiceNow Knowledge16.
Photo by SiliconANGLE
Since you’re here …
… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.
If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.