UPDATED 21:46 EDT / MAY 02 2017

CLOUD

Red Hat is eating software, but could heft slow them down, analysts ask

With all of the open-source companies that would love to pocket Red Hat Inc.’s profits, none of them have matched its quarter-after-quarter growth nor its $15 billion market capitalization.

At Red Hat Summit in Boston, Massachusetts, Stu Miniman (@stu) (pictured, left) and Rebecca Knight (@knightrm) (pictured, right), co-hosts of theCUBE, SiliconANGLE Media’s mobile live streaming studio, asked, why not? (*Disclosure below.)

Red Hat Chief Executive Officer James Whitehurst’s answer is simple: “Selling free is hard,” he once said in an interview, according to Miniman.

Hard, but not impossible, as Red Hat’s numbers prove. Founded in 1993, the company has been at the fore of the open-source revolution for some time. With many enterprises beginning to prefer open-source technology, software providers feel pressure to meet demand, but the profitability question remains vexing.

“Software is eating the world, and open source is eating software,” said Miniman, adding that Red Hat is one company smack in the center of this. So what are the special moves that makes Red Hat unique, and why do other comers find them so hard to mimic?

Red Hat’s timing could be one factor; it got in early in open source and found room to expand, Miniman said. Another might be the way it lives the open-source philosophy down to its DNA, contrasted with others for whom open-source is a detail.

“They’re like, ‘Oh, we’re not an open-source company, we’re an enterprise software company or a software company first,'” Miniman said of some Red Hat competitors. “I’m sure if we asked Red Hat if they were a software company, they would say, ‘Well of course, everything we deliver is software, but at their DNA, they are open-source,'” he said.

Do fat pockets sink open-source ships?

Surely, Red Hat’s growth in the early days owed something to its nimbleness as a relatively small startup, a trait it tries to retain even today with almost 8,000 employees.

“We heard in the keynote, one of the things that Jim Whitehurst was trying to do is to cultivate a startup mindset — is that possible?” asked Knight.

The problem is that a company’s bulk tends to decelerate its pace of innovation. Miniman and Knight wondered if Cloudera Inc.Hortonworks Inc. and other smaller open-source or open-core competitors use Red Hat’s success against them by adapting faster to market changes?

Watch the complete video interview below, and be sure to check out more of SiliconANGLE’s and theCUBE’s independent editorial coverage of Red Hat Summit 2017. (* Disclosure: Red Hat Inc. sponsors some Red Hat Summit segments on SiliconANGLE Media’s theCUBE. Neither Red Hat nor other sponsors have editorial control over content on theCUBE or SiliconANGLE.)

Photo: SiliconANGLE

Since you’re here …

… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.

If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.