Doubling solutions to cure disaster recovery’s recurring pains
Data backup and disaster recovery methods are seemingly stuck in a time warp. The problems of 20 years ago are still present and pressing, according to Dave Russell (pictured), vice president and distinguished analyst at Gartner Inc. While underlying infrastructure has come and gone, many backup and DR pain points have stubbornly remained, he pointed out. They include data glut, tight backup windows, high cost and complexity.
“Cost is even more important than it ever was,” Russell told Stu Miniman (@stu) and Dave Vellante (@dvellante), co-hosts of theCUBE, SiliconANGLE Media’s mobile livestreaming studio, during this year’s VeeamOn event in New Orleans, Louisiana. (* Disclosure below.)
As a Gartner analyst, Russell has seen frustrating trends in backup economics for some time. “We’ve seen negative pricing pressure on dollars-per-terabyte of backup software now for three years,” he said.
The list price at some vendors is as high as $10,000 to $14,000 per terabyte of data. Meanwhile, one-terabyte drives sell at information technology shops for under $200. “I’m spending list price $14,000 a terabyte to protect $140 worth of equipment. There’s a problem here,” Russell stated.
Backup for backup
Many businesses realize that their backup strategy has room for improvement but do not know where to start. Should they tweak their remaining solution or throw it out for a brand new one?
“The answer for many organizations is a little bit of both,” Russell said. In past years, it was common to collapse several backup solutions into one best-of-breed product. Now organizations realize that “sweeping the floor” and starting over isn’t always practical or economical.
“At least try to get the value out of what you bought and deployed,” Russel said.
Companies can choose a second backup solution to complement the one they currently run. “We see this happening in the industry overall,” he added.
Some may hope that a public cloud or software as a service provider will simply take backup out of their hands. Companies who take this hands-off approach are most likely running a bit exposed and may not realize it, according to Russell.
“If an organization really wants to protect their data like they have, they’re going to need a third-party solution,” Russell said.
Watch the complete video interview below, and be sure to check out more of SiliconANGLE’s and theCUBE’s coverage of VeeamOn 2017. (* Disclosure: TheCUBE is a paid media partner for VeeamOn 2017. Neither Veeam Software Inc. nor other sponsors have editorial influence on theCUBE or SiliconANGLE.)
Photo: SiliconANGLE
Since you’re here …
… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.
If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.