UPDATED 12:18 EDT / JULY 03 2014

To control storage costs, aim services at “the fat middle”

Cloud-optimized_storage_Companies and service providers designing cloud services to control costs should aim at the “fat middle” of the application population, with a goal of reducing storage costs 50 percent for 80 percent of applications, writes Wikibon CTO David Floyer in “The Challenges of Enabling Low-cost Enterprise Cloud Storage Services”.  The “fat middle” is made up Tier 1-light and Tier 2 applications, and the design focus should be on simplicity in architecture and management. The service specifically should not be designed for very low latency databases and applications that demand more expensive services and management on the one side or applications that need very low cost storage on the other.

Today hybrid arrays provide the best compromise between performance and cost, Floyer writes. All-flash arrays are still too expensive and focused on high-performance applications where cost-per-IOPS is more important than cost-per-Gbyte. Server SAN, which combines the advantages of software-defined storage and direct-attached storage to provide a flexible, high-performance storage architecture, is still too immature although Floyer believes this situation will change rapidly in 2015 and beyond.

Many vendors provide hybrid systems that can work, but he focuses on IBM’s XIV. It provides simplicity, eliminates the need for tiering for the target applications, handles “noisy neighbors” (applications that make heavy demands on infrastructure that may impact other applications sharing the same storage array) and can be operated by a small staff. He recommends that XIV be included in RFPs for shared storage services, although it is not perfect, and he provides a detailed analysis of its strengths and weaknesses.

Floyer presents a model comparing the cost of traditional tiered storage to that of cloud-optimized hybrid storage for a company with $10 billion in revenue and a total IT budget of $150 million (see graphic above). The model predicts that for the “fat middle” applications, the total cost of storage could be reduced from $16,169,000 to $8,474,000.

As with all Wikibon research, this Professional Alert is available in its entirety without charge on the Wikibon Web site. IT professionals are invited to register for free membership in the Wikibon community, which allows them to participate in Wikibon research, influence the research agenda, and publish their own research, questions and comments.

Graphic courtesy Wikibon.org

Since you’re here …

… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.

If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.