UPDATED 11:00 EDT / MARCH 09 2015

Wikibon analyst: Open Data Platform debate is all about the money

big data love heart numbers analytics open falling pour spillThe debate over the Open Data Platform presently raging in the Big Data community is, at its core, about money and is generated by the very different business models of the two main Hadoop competitors – Hortonworks, Inc. and Cloudera, Inc..

The total Big Data market, including Hadoop, analysis systems and surrounding services, will top $50 billion in 2017, writes Wikibon Big Data Analyst Jeff Kelly. But, Hadoop and its surrounding services will only account for 3 percent, or about $677 million, of that figure. The rest of the money will come from software and services higher up the stack. Cloudera and Hortonworks, the two primary suppliers of Hadoop distros and services, who collectively have raised more than $1.5 billion in venture capital, are understandably fighting for every penny.

Hortonworks’ strategy is to focus on providing and advancing pure Apache open source Hadoop distros and to make its money on services. This makes it a perfect fit for the Open Data Platform, a consortium mainly of vendors of higher level analytics and similar products and services including IBM and Pivotal Software, Inc. .

Cloudera, in contrast, makes money selling proprietary Hadoop extensions and isn’t interested in making the Hadoop stack a commodity. Thus Cloudera has a vested interest in opposing the platform.

Kelly has summarized the points on both sides on several occasions, including his presentation at the recent SiliconMEDIA BigDataSV 2015 event. That debate will, and should, continue for some time, he writes. But at its core is the competition for the money the market promises.

Kelly’s full analysis is available on the new Wikibon Premium site without charge.

photo credit: Special*Dark via photopin cc

Since you’re here …

… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.

If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.