UPDATED 17:27 EDT / AUGUST 08 2016

NEWS

UK copyright law threatens 3D printing movement, says Pirate Party founder

More and more consumers are jumping on the 3D printing bandwagon as 3D printers continue to become cheaper and more powerful, but according to Pirate Party founder Rick Falkvinge, a recent change to copyright law in the United Kingdom could threaten the future of this growing movement.

Last month, the UK followed an example set by the European Union by extending copyrights for designs from a 25 years to 70 years after the death of the designer. This puts copyright on designs on par with similar laws for literature and film, but in a recent article for Private Internet Access (via Ars Technica), Falkvinge calls the new law for designs “a direct assault on the 3D printing revolution.”

“The obvious first argument [against the law] is that the very existence of exclusive rights are justified by allegedly incentivizing the design process. ‘You come up with something good, you get a monopoly on exploiting it commercially for 25 years,'” Falkvinge said. “Therefore, extending the monopoly term retroactively makes no sense at all – somebody is not going to change their minds 25 years ago because of changes to law today. Designs that already exist won’t stop existing because of later legislative efforts. Therefore, moving designs out of the public domain is arguably stealing from that public domain, as it negates property rights of makers.”

“The second odd observation is that the UK law in question commingles patent law and copyright law, which are rather different beasts,” Falkvinge continued. “Furniture is normally protected by something known as a design patent and not by copyright, and this has enormous ramifications for 3D printing: when something is under patent, you’re absolutely and one hundred percent free to make copies of it for your own use with your own tools and materials. When something is under copyright, you are not.”

Falkvinge argued that the law will lead to prosecution against anyone who manufactures their own furniture using their own tools. He noted that this outcome is purely a result of the way copyright and patent law work in Europe versus the way they work in the United States.

“So in the United States, a change from patent protection to copyright protection would not matter much when it comes to maker culture and 3D printing. In the European Union, which is where this is taking place, it matters a whole lot.”

Photo by Maria Keays 

Since you’re here …

… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.

If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.