EMERGING TECH
EMERGING TECH
EMERGING TECH
Tricky ticker: Pacemaker data ruled admissible in criminal trial
Since their invention in 1958, pacemakers have saved many lives, but in 2017 its benefits are more complicated. Not only do the devices face the risk of being hacked, their data can also be used in criminal trials.
An Ohio judge this week ruled that the data recorded by a pacemaker can be used as evidence in the trial of 59-year-old Ross Compton of Middletown, Ohio. Compton is being tried on felony charges of aggravated arson and insurance fraud for allegedly starting a fire at his home in September.
Prosecutors are arguing that data from his pacemaker — in particular, his heart rate at the time the alleged arson took place — is relevant evidence. According to Journal-News, Compton claims that he was asleep when the fire started and when he woke he packed some belongings, broke out the glass of his bedroom window with a cane and threw the bags and suitcase outside before taking them to his car. A cardiologist employed by the prosecution claims that given Compton’s medical condition this would be impossible and that data from his pacemaker would prove this to be the case.
A lawyer for Compton argued that the access to data from a pacemaker was a breach of his “constitutional rights and unreasonable seizure of his private information,” while prosecutors argued that police regularly seize medical records for evidence in criminal cases and a pacemaker was no different.
Common Pleas Judge Charles Pater agreed with the prosecution, ruling that “just because the pacemaker data is individual to Compton doesn’t mean it is more private than other things.”
In an interview with CNET, Compton’s lawyer Glenn Rossi said that he was disappointed with the court’s decision to allow the evidence and that the issue is bigger than just his client’s case. Allowing such evidence “further expands the government’s ability to access some of our most fundamental private information. Medical data regarding the inner functions of one’s body designed to assist a doctor in keeping a patient alive should be safeguarded against government overreach.”
Photo: Pixabay
Since you’re here …
… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.
If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.
