UPDATED 13:47 EST / JANUARY 01 2018

NEWS

UK may tax ‘ruthless profiteers’ such as Facebook for slow response to extremist content

A United Kingdom official wants to impose higher taxes on tech giants that don’t do their share to fight extremist web content.

In an interview with the Sunday Times on Dec. 31, Ben Wallace, the U.K.’s minister of state for security, accused companies such as Facebook Inc. and Google LLC of passing off the burden of policing their content to the government, which must spend significant resources on tracking and countering potential terrorist threats on the companies’ online platforms.

“We should stop pretending that because they sit on beanbags in T-shirts they are not ruthless profiteers,” Wallace said. “They will ruthlessly sell our details to loans and soft-porn companies but not give it to our democratically elected government.”

Wallace did not specify the amount of his proposed tax, but the Sunday Times called his plan a “multimillion-pound tax raid” on tech giants. The goal of the tax would be to pressure Facebook and others to invest more resources in fighting extremism and to cooperate more closely with government authorities.

Facebook rejected Wallace’s accusations, saying that it is already doing everything it can to track illegal content and share relevant information with law enforcement. “Mr. Wallace is wrong to say that we put profit before safety, especially in the fight against terrorism,” said Simon Milner, Facebook’s policy director for the U.K., Middle East and Africa. “We’ve invested millions of pounds in people and technology to identify and remove terrorist content.”

A spokesperson for Google’s YouTube also denied Wallace’s claims: “Over the course of 2017 we have made significant progress through investing in machine learning technology, recruiting more reviewers, building partnerships with experts and collaboration with other companies.”

YouTube has already been on thin ice with the U.K. government since March, when reports revealed that the platform displayed government-sponsored ads alongside videos promoting antisemitism, homophobia and other controversial views. The report called attention to flaws in YouTube’s ad system, leading to a mass exodus of major advertisers until Google tightened its restrictions.

Wallace would not be the first European politician to want companies such as Facebook to pay up for not acting quickly enough on illicit content. Heiko Maas, head of Germany’s Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection, said in March that he wanted to impose a fine of up to $60 million (50 million euros) on companies that do not remove “clearly criminal” content within 24 hours.

After the law passed in June, Mass said that “without political pressure, the large platform operators will not fulfill their obligations.” Wallace seems to agree.

Photo: Facebook

Since you’re here …

… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.

If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.