Google pay analysis finds some men paid less than women doing the same job
It seems some men at Google LLC have been getting the short end of the stick when it comes to pay, according to a recent pay equity analysis study.
In a blog post today, Lauren Barbato, Google’s lead analyst for pay equity and people analytics, wrote that some men were being paid less the women doing the same jobs in 2018. Level 4 Software Engineers, said the report, often “received less discretionary funds than women.”
Following the study, the results of which were revealed to employees in January but only made public now, Google paid 10,677 employees an extra $9.7 million in compensation, although Google didn’t state just how many men received pay increases.
Last year when Google did a similar study, it revealed that a total of $270,000 was given to 228 workers to ensure pay equality. The difference was partly because of extra pay going to new hires.
“Our pay equity analysis ensures that compensation is fair for employees in the same job, at the same level, location and performance,” said Google. “But we know that’s only part of the story. Because leveling, performance ratings, and promotion impact pay, this year, we are undertaking a comprehensive review of these processes to make sure the outcomes are fair and equitable for all employees.”
In the past, Google has been accused of underpaying women who do the same jobs as men. In 2017, the U.S. Department of Labor said it found evidence of systemic compensation disparities against women. A year later, Google employees around the world took to the streets to protest against sexual misconduct and to promote pay equity for women.
Google has tried it seems to balance pay and ensure diversity in the workplace. In 2017 a software engineer called James Damore was fired for an internal memo he sent arguing that the reason why men might fill many of the better engineering positions was partly down to “inherent biological differences in men and women.”
Not only did Damore later start a class action lawsuit charging Google with discrimination against him, but the topic of inherent biological differences and equality of outcome has been a cause célèbre in the U.S. and beyond since then. The lawsuit argued that Google to the detriment of others filled diversity quotas.
Personalities such as psychologist Jordan Peterson have defended Damore’s assertions, but more broadly some critics are now saying people are afraid to air their views in an environment that can be less than forgiving.
Photo: Tobin/Flickr
Since you’re here …
… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.
If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.