Broadcom Wins Emulex Patent Suit
After Emulex rejected Broadcom’s two-month effort to acquire the company in July 2009, it filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the latter that has finally been closed, Bloomberg reported. U.S. District Judge James Selna of Santa Ana, Calif. denied a motion by Emulex for summary judgment on the verdict. The judge found that three Emulex semiconductors and four of its Fibre channel switches have infringed two of Broadcom’s US patents -nos. 7,058,150 and 7,471,69.
Among the products are BladeEngine 2 and 3 and Lancer chips.
“We will work with our suppliers to implement design changes if necessary for the SerDes modules included in Emulex integrated chips,” Emulex said in its statement. “We plan to take appropriate steps to ensure continued product supply.”
Emulex’s shares went down 6.4 percent, the equivalent of 45 cents, to $6.62, while Broadcom slid by 3.4 percent to $27.74. Emulex may seen further decline in the first quarter of 2012, the timeframe when Broadcom asked Judge Selna to review a request for a permanent injunction preventing Emulex from selling the products above in the US.
As Broadcom finalizes its legal clash with Emules over its patents, the company is working towards developing new offerings to address several of the fastest growing markets for its products. One of the most recent launches is the BCM20730 low-power chip for computer accessories. It’s fully compatible with Bluetooth according to Broadcom and puts a big emphasis on increasing the power efficiency of the smaller gadgets lying around in the typical household. The reference design is said to be capable of achieving an extension of years to battery life.
Another recent update that expanded Broadcom’s patent portfolio is the $3.7 billion deal to acquire NetLogic, a maker of networking semiconductors. That breaks down to $50 per share.
Since you’re here …
… We’d like to tell you about our mission and how you can help us fulfill it. SiliconANGLE Media Inc.’s business model is based on the intrinsic value of the content, not advertising. Unlike many online publications, we don’t have a paywall or run banner advertising, because we want to keep our journalism open, without influence or the need to chase traffic.The journalism, reporting and commentary on SiliconANGLE — along with live, unscripted video from our Silicon Valley studio and globe-trotting video teams at theCUBE — take a lot of hard work, time and money. Keeping the quality high requires the support of sponsors who are aligned with our vision of ad-free journalism content.
If you like the reporting, video interviews and other ad-free content here, please take a moment to check out a sample of the video content supported by our sponsors, tweet your support, and keep coming back to SiliconANGLE.